🔗 Share this article

Mainstream political parties are more and more allowing the far right to set the public discourse, as per a new research carried out in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Academics discovered that this phenomenon has inadvertently helped radical groups by validating their viewpoints and spreading them more widely.

Study Based on Two Decades of Media Coverage

The findings, released in the academic journal on political studies, relied on an computerized content review of over 520,000 news pieces from six national newspapers.

Capital-based scholars observed that as the radical faction shifted from fringe issues in the late 1990s to core subjects like integration and immigration, mainstream political groups progressively adjusted their messaging in reaction.

This adaptation boosted the spread of these concepts and indicated to the electorate that such positions were acceptable.

Implications for Democracy

"Political communication by mainstream parties plays a central role in the electoral success of the radical right," explained a expert in political behavior involved in the research.

"This factor has been overlooked," she noted.

The effect was noticeable even when mainstream parties were criticising the radical faction. "You're still giving them attention," the expert remarked. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this focus is crucial."

Normalisation Effect Across the Continent

While the study was focused on the German context, this normalisation effect is likely to affect nations throughout the European continent.

"This is frequently observed in German and British media," said another co-author. "The far right says something and everybody starts talking about it for one week."

"Even if you're opposing it, you're echoing it," he stated.

Hardening of Public Rhetoric

At certain points, political figures have also hardened their discourse to match that of the far right.

In a recently published interview, a then national leader advocated widespread expulsions and pushed for them to happen "more frequently and rapidly."

Similar examples can be found throughout Europe, as politicians from nations including the United Kingdom to the French Republic adopt the language of the far right, especially on migration.

This has formed an feedback loop that would have been unthinkable a decade ago.

Core Issue: Who Dictates the Narrative?

"{If you're a moderate party and you are discussing societal topics – immigration, assimilation – in a way that is dictated by the rhythm of the radical right, that's the whole idea of agenda setting," clarified a researcher.

Other political parties have taken additional measures, seeking to copy the strict agenda of the radical right, despite research suggests that doing so drives voters to cast their ballot for the far right.

Gradual Impact and Public Perception

The extent of information collected revealed that the impact of far-right groups had been gradual and had increased with the passage of time.

"Voter awareness doesn't change from day to day," stated a researcher. "But if you encounter this negative framing around immigration frequently, and it is being disseminated not only by far-right parties but also, for instance, by mainstream parties, then of course this storyline gains more traction."

Requirement for Mainstream Groups to Develop Their Own Discourses

The research emphasized the need for mainstream parties to develop their own discourses, especially on subjects such as migration and assimilation, rather than constantly following the far right.

"It resembles a choreography," explained one researcher. "When the leader is far-right and you're reacting to it, you cannot decide which tune should be playing."